McCarron wife may be implicated in sex sting case

The sting operation was conducted by the FBI.

The wife of ex-Navy contractor Michael McCarron was cautioned by the court that her testimony could incriminate her criminally and land her in jail just like her husband, Michael McCarron, who was previously implicated in a sex sting operation in March of this year.

In 2017, Michael McCarron was picked up by the FBI after he used the internet to attempt to have sex with a minor he also sent lewd photographs of himself to. But while he thought he was talking to a minor, he was really talking with an undercover FBI agent posing as a minor.

That sting operation landed him in jail on charges of attempted enticement of a minor and attempted transfer of obscene material to a minor.

While he was granted pre-trial release and allowed to return to his home in Idaho, new allegations that he and his wife placed advertisements for sex on a commercial sex website called “Skip the Games” has him back on Guam in custody for violating the conditions of his release.

Wednesday’s hearing addressed whether or not Michael should be allowed back on pre-trial release. His wife, Linnea McCarron, appeared via video conference from the U.S. District Court in Idaho to testify in support of her husband’s release.

But while she was testifying, one question raised by the government prompted District Court Magistrate Judge Joaquin Manibusan to advise her to take caution before answering.

This came about as the government established that the couple was together physically during the period of the alleged violations and after further describing Michael’s phone as a flip phone with no internet access and Linnea’s phone as the one with Internet capabilities.

The question, “Who posted that?” centers around an advertisement that according to the FBI is linked back to the McCarrons which they believe was done through the use of a mobile device shared by the couple.

But before Linnea could respond, Judge Manibusan stepped in reminding her of her 5th amendment right against self-incrimination.

The judge asked her if she would like to consult with an attorney before she answers and whether or not she should continue to testify as her statements may subject her to criminal prosecution.

This I when Linnea posed a question to the court, asking quote, “Is it against the law to post looking for somebody without money?”

Linnea opted to consult with an attorney before making any additional statements to the court. Judge Manibusan has continued the pre-trial release hearing and granted her with three weeks to confer with an attorney.

It was noted that trial in the case is set to begin on Oct. 29, 2019, and that the hearing would not affect the case from proceeding to trial.

The continued motion hearing is set for Nov. 8, 2019.


Previous articleGDOE teachers learn about robotics
Next articleVIDEO: Governor and Congressman debate rival war rep bills
Jolene joined the PNC team in 2017, as a producer, co-anchor and investigative reporter covering law enforcement, courts and crimes. Notable coverage includes the Ehlert case, the Mark Torre Jr. trial, the Allan Agababa trial, exclusive pieces on the Life of a Drug Dealer/Addict, and Life behind bars...the story of Honofre Chargualaf and Kevin Cruz. In 2019, she was promoted to Assistant News Director and Lead Anchor. From 2015 to 2017 she served as Public Relations and Promotions Manager, for the Hotel Nikko Guam handling local radio and advertorial promotions, as well as produced and directed tv commercials for the hotel. Prior to this she worked with KUAM for three years as a reporter and segment host. She began her journalism career in 2012, working with Glimpses of Guam contributing to the Guam Business Magazine, R&R magazine, MDM magazine and the Marianas Business Journal.